![]() ![]() Who needs to know about that when you’re Calling your Duties or prancing around in your fancy hats in TF2? All you’re likely to worry about are pedestrian concerns, like the fact that this card needs only 140W of power, so it requires just one six-pin power input. Heck, you probably don’t even care that the card has a mixed-density memory config with three 64-bit interfaces driving 2GB of GDDR5 memory. This value proposition doesn’t involve difficult math. The ROP rate and memory bandwidth haven’t even changed, and yet the price is down 70 bucks. And yes, that really is a drop from 14 Xboxes worth of filtering power to 10. Versus the GTX 660 Ti, this ever-so “new” product is a tad slower in texture filtering, rasterization, and shader flops rates. Look, it’s as simple as a few key variables. And if you have half a working lobe in your skull, you know what’s coming next: the price is lower, along with the performance. You can see from the picture that it’s based on the same reference design as the GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GTX 670. I’m totally not going to tell you about the video card shown above, the GeForce GTX 660. This second-rate website can get a new spokesmonkey. I should be, I dunno, explaining write coalescing in the Xeon Phi or editing a multicast IP routing table somewhere, not helping you lot decide between a video card with 10 Xbox 360s worth of rendering power and another with 14. I am nobody’s fool, and I’m not going to keep playing this same record over and over again, like Joe Biden at the DNC. Heck, I can see your lips moving while I talk. By now, the script is getting to be pretty stale. You probably expect me to say something about how the competition from AMD is pretty decent, too, although the Radeon’s power draw is higher. By now, you know how it ends: with me explaining that this new graphics card delivers enough performance for most people and questioning why anyone would spend more. You know the one, where Nvidia has taken its potent Kepler GPU architecture, shaved off a few bits, and raised the performance ceiling for a lower price range. Every few weeks, it seems like, we’re back in this same place, and I’m telling the same story again. You know, we really can’t keep meeting like this. Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 3540 million transistors.OK, wow, this is awkward. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti There is no data PCIe lanes. The first graphics card has There is no data PCIe lanes. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is set to GM107. ![]() Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti is equipped with GK104. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti uses the Maxwell architecture. Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti is built on Kepler. What architecture are video cards based on? NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is equipped with There is no data HDMI outputs. Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti uses There is no data. Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti has There is no data HDMI outputs. The second one has 2 GB of RAM installed. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti works with GDDR5. What kind of memory do graphics cards have? The clock base frequency of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti reaches 1020 MHz. In this case, the maximum frequency reaches 980 MHz. Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti operates at 915 MHz. How fast are Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti? But the second video card has FLOPS equal to 1.4 TFLOPS. What FLOPS do video cards have?įLOPS Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti is 2.34 TFLOPS. The second video card scored 3852 points in Passmark. Passmark Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti scored 4281 points. How does the Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti processor perform in benchmarks? Regarding cooling, Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 150W heat dissipation requirements versus 60W for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti. Video card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti - Directx version - 12. Video card Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti has Directx version 11. The first video card is connected using PCIe 3.0 x16. In 3DMark, the first model scored 5323 points. In the Passmark benchmark, Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti scored 4281 points. The bandwidth of the first video card is 144 Gb/s versus 86.4 Gb/s of the second.įLOPS of Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti is 2.34. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 2 GB installed. The base clock speed of the first video card is 915 MHz versus 1020 MHz for the second. Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti has a transistor size of 28 nm versus 28. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti on the Maxwell architecture. The Palit GeForce GTX 660 Ti video card is based on the Kepler architecture. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |